Plan your next trial on mastered site intelligence.

The ground the trial will run on, resolved before the first site is chosen. One golden record per site and investigator — built from internal, public, and subscribed sources — searchable, mappable, and queryable in plain language.

Site & Investigator Mastery

Every site and investigator, resolved to one golden record.

Vivo masters trial data spanning sites, investigators, and assets — deduplicated and reconciled across your historical trials, public registries, and subscribed data sources. For feasibility and site-strategy teams, that means competitive intelligence and trial planning on data you can actually trust.

  • View and filter by specialty, geography, therapeutic area, and past participation
  • Internal performance history alongside public and subscribed sources
  • Compare a site's performance for you vs. everyone else
  • Searchable, mappable, and queryable in plain language via Ask Vivo

Golden Record — Site Profile

Site 4021 · Academic Medical Center · Neurology
Resolved from 4 sources · 3 duplicate records merged
Past trials
17 (9 oncology)
Median startup
94 days
Enrollment vs plan
+12% historical
Active competing trials
2 in indication
3 investigators linked · dropout history · deviation rates · data quality history

Enrollment Scenarios

Scenario A · 42 sites · 6 countries LPI in 14 mo
Scenario B · 61 sites · 9 countries LPI in 11 mo · 19 more sites
Scenario C · shortlist only · 28 sites LPI in 19 mo
Expected performance tailored per site from past performance · assumptions editable and documented
Feasibility & Planning

Enrollment scenarios built on real site history.

Create enrollment scenarios from site and investigator shortlists. Capture data from feasibility reports, tailor expected site performance metrics based on past performance, and compare the scenarios side by side — speed, scale, and risk made explicit before commitments are made.

  • Shortlists drawn directly from mastered site and investigator records
  • Site-level expected performance grounded in history, not averages
  • Vendor planning: the vendor slate captured alongside the site plan
  • Compare actuals back to the plan throughout the trial
Ask Vivo for Site Intelligence

The questions planning teams ask.

Plan v. Actual Enrollment
Have any of the sites I'm considering struggled with recruitment historically?
Feasibility
How many patients did Site 103 recruit across all oncology studies this year?
Retention
Have any of my planned sites had high dropout in past studies?
Retrospective Analyses
In our last trial, could we have predicted that Site X would enroll zero patients?
Poor Performing Sites
In the last 3 years, what's my worst site across all trials in oncology?
Competitive Intelligence
Who is running a competing trial and when does it start? What sites are they using?
Site Startup
Of our historic trials in immunology, list the top 20 slowest sites to start up.
Internal v. External
For Site X, how have they performed for us vs. other sponsors in rare diseases?
Protocol Deviations
Which sites have high rates of protocol deviations?

The system that selects your sites can also monitor them.

Plans made here give the running trial a warm start: the same golden records and expectations carry into Trial Oversight — no handoff to another vendor, one governed foundation end to end.

Site intelligence is in early access with launch partners.

Proven on internal and subscribed data from large pharma. Join the early program to plan your next trial on mastered site intelligence.